|
Posted: 03/2001
VOIP SEES UPS AND DOWNS AS A CUSTOMER
MANAGEMENT TOOL By Becky Bracken
VOICE OVER IP, SPECIFICALLY IN THE form
of click-to-talk technology integrated into websites, has been
considered an important tool for e-commerce providers to reach out
to online consumers and provide immediate answers to questions and
concerns.
However, a recently released report from
Jupiter Research Inc. (http://www.jup.com/) casts a shadow
over the outlook for click-to-talk customer service interfaces as a
viable customer relationship management tool for online retailers.
The online buyers surveyed in the report cited lackluster interest
and experience with VoIP, and indicated they rarely used or would
consider using such features.
But those within the VoIP community that
employ the technology say the report may be giving only part of the
story. While VoIP proponents admit the technology is certainly in
its infancy, they add that, if used correctly, VoIP can be a
powerful and cost-effective communication tool.
The report, titled "Customers Put PC
Calls on Hold," released Dec. 20, 2000, states: "Customers and sites
that have embraced VoIP have been disappointed with the results; the
majority of the 18 percent of consumers who have tried VoIP
technology are unsatisfied. While latency and poor quality will
constrain adoption among consumers, enterprises should explore
implementing this technology in the contact center to reduce telecom
expenses."
David Daniels, lead analyst and author of
the Jupiter report, says that online retailers have misinterpreted
customer desire for the option to have an available phone number for
voice interaction with the merchant and instead provide the VoIP
function to their sites.
While this particular research indicates
that VoIP features are not particularly effective customer service
tools, VoIP technology can be implemented with great results as a
means of reducing telecommunications charges by running voice calls
on an IP network.
"What we've seen is that a lot of sites
and a lot of online customer service solutions were introducing
voice over IP as a solution to that customer expectation," Daniels
says. "So we had the belief going into this that perhaps that
technology is still a little bit ahead of where consumers are at
today. And, where consumers have indicated a preference for voice,
what they're really talking about is the traditional telephone and
not some type of newer technology. So that's really what led us down
the path to do the research."
The Jupiter Consumer survey of online
buyers for the report found that only 18 percent have used VoIP
technology. Of that 18 percent, 72 percent were not satisfied with
the quality.
"Since the technology is still immature,
it could do more harm than good," Daniels says. "In our report we
found, of the people that used [VoIP], the majority of them were not
satisfied with the quality. What we've seen--as customers have
indicated--is a preference to interact with companies over the
telephone. In our surveys that we've done, we've seen that about 65
percent of the consumers expect to interact via the telephone for
customer service."
When online buyers were asked how they
would contact a website when it has been unresponsive to an e-mail
inquiry, "just one percent of respondents said they would make a
VoIP call if the company offered that option," the report
says.
Aurica Yen, an analyst with the Yankee
Group's Consumer Market Convergence Planning Service, says that
customers just have a hard time warming up to the technology.
"I think it's a total mind shift, pushing
down your instincts to pick up a phone and dial a few numbers vs.
booting up your PC and using that to contact somebody," Yen says.
"It's hard to get a consumer to understand that or to really find a
value in that."
But, she adds, the numbers taken from her
research indicate a growing penetration in the marketplace.
"To give credit, what we've noticed in
our past survey this year, there's 11 percent penetration now of
U.S. households that have used it at least once or twice. That
definitely is showing that industry's credibility. Penetration last
year was 4 percent for Internet telephony, so 7 percent growth is
almost triple growth over a year," Yen says. "This stuff may end up
a niche type of product, but it will find more adoption in the
consumer space because there is a cost savings there."
MANY SOLUTIONS
One explanation for customers choosing
not to use VoIP could be a lack of the computer equipment necessary
to make a VoIP call. But according to the Jupiter survey, "Web
veterans with multimedia PCs said that they haven't attempted to
communicate in this manner."
Steve Kowarsky, executive vice president
and VP of sales of CosmoCom Inc. (http://www.cosmocom.com/), a
VoIP vendor and provider of new generation call center platforms,
says that VoIP should be just one means of customer interaction with
an e-tailer in an entire communications arsenal.
He says savvy Internet users comfortable
with the technology who select a VoIP option on a site will
understand what to expect from the experience and be less prone to
be disappointed with the quality. While he says he doesn't want to
fault Jupiter's findings, Kowarsky adds there is a constituency of
online shoppers that are very comfortable with VoIP. There are other
customers that prefer e-mail and still others interested only in
telephone communication. A retailer that provides a variety of
communication offerings will better serve its customers, he
adds.
The technology is still so new that only
certain types of customers are going to take advantage and be
satisfied with this type of feature. E-mail is still the preferred
method of communication for most online shoppers, and many don't
have the interest in taking advantage of VoIP.
"I think customers are confused by it
[VoIP]," Daniels says. "E-mail has really captured the fancy of
customers online. It's a proven technology that everybody recognizes
and knows."
SATISFACTION GUARANTEED
Much customer dissatisfaction with VoIP,
according to Daniels, can be attributed to a lack of integration of
a company's communications systems and customer information with the
VoIP solution. The best scenario would be if a hit on a
click-to-talk button also popped up a customer's records on the call
center representative's screen. If a customer has already engaged in
an e-mail dialogue with an online retailer, there will
understandably be a certain level of frustration if it is necessary
to restate the problem, inquiry or customer history with the
merchant when a connection is made using click-to-talk.
Some vendors or service providers now
offer click-to-talk on an ASP basis, providing the VoIP
infrastructure and technology, and allowing other companies to place
a click-to-talk button on their sites. In that case, the
click-to-talk capability is not integrated into other back-office
systems, such as customer records. Daniels says, "Their pricing is
less, and it's usually on a transaction basis. However, that channel
isn't integrated with any of the other service technologies that a
company might have. So those solutions are definitely more
affordable, but certainly not as comprehensive."
The first generation of
voice-over-the-web services wasn't designed to meet the needs of
e-businesses, says Ian Halpern, spokesman for eStara Inc. (http://www.estara.com/).
"Many were repackaged
consumer-to-consumer solutions characterized by long connection
times, unsatisfactory sound quality and spotty reliability," Halpern
says. "This experience reflects the past rather than the present or
future of web voice."
eStara has developed web voice solutions
specifically designed to meet the needs of e-business. The company
realized that in order to use web voice as a meaningful part of the
customer contact channel, it would have to develop a solution that
is easy to use for the customer; offers crisp, clear sound quality;
and is extremely easy to integrate into the call center.
"eStara believes it has accomplished
this, Halpern says. "We offer a new kind of web voice experience. We
believe this is reflected in the adoption of our solution by leading
companies like J. Crew Inc. [http://www.jcrew.com/], Allfirst
Bank Financial Inc. [http://www.allfirst.com/] and
the NHL's Washington Capitals [http://www.washingtoncaps.com/]."
Jordan Katz, director of e-commerce for
Net2Phone Inc. (http://www.net2phone.com/), the
company responsible for the development of click-to-talk technology,
says pure-play e-tailers aren't always good candidates for VoIP
contact buttons. First, most large online retailers aren't equipped
with large call centers--Amazon.com Inc. (http://www.amazon.com/) being a
prime example--and voice customer service isn't generally a large
pure-click's core competency. Therefore, a click-to-talk VoIP
feature that uses the phone as a means of customer contact isn't
going to add much customer value. He adds that click-to-talk is an
ideal fit in the small to medium-sized enterprise (SME) market,
where websites function as an extension of a Yellow Pages
listing.
Katz uses the example of a local florist.
A local florist takes orders in two ways: by walk-in traffic and by
telephone. E-mail isn't a viable means of communication for this
type of business. But if a local florist's site is equipped with
VoIP, that will facilitate communication with the merchant in a way
that is comfortable for interaction with customers: the
phone.
THE BROADBAND CONNECTION
Another barrier to widespread VoIP
functionality and acceptance is the still more than 90 percent of
U.S. households that currently connect to the Internet through a
dial-up connection, according to the Jupiter report.
"The 22.3 million AOL subscribers in the
U.S. amplify this problem, since a complex array of proxy servers
lifts these users to the wired world," the report says. "Most
problems (with latency and quality) will be eradicated by the
adoption of broadband connections, which will surpass 23 million
U.S. households in 2004."
The report goes on to say that as
broadband becomes available, consumers will be free to use phone
lines, killing the need for "experimental vocal technologies," like
VoIP.
Yen agrees that a lack of broadband
connectivity has slowed the widespread adoption of voice
applications.
"What's going to push Internet telephony
or these types of new enhanced voice applications will be the
deployment of high speed, deployment of broadband, deployment of
cable telephony," Yen says. "The thing to think about is, it's not
only when the consumers understand these services, it's when they
understand the shifting of the communications services industry in
general."
Where the report does identify an
immediate value in VoIP is within an enterprise for PSTN calls to
internal IP backbones, "which will ultimately cut toll charges and
blend voice with other media," the report says. "Based on
traditional average call-handle times and costs, companies employing
VoIP can save $2.20 per service call in addition to savings on call
center infrastructure."
"What we point to in this report is that
where voice over IP can be best served is within the enterprise,"
Daniels says. "Meaning [that] once a traditional phone call has been
launched and it hits that company's switch, the call can then use
VoIP technology to move to [the company's] own internal network. The
customer shouldn't even know that's happening. That's all in the
background, and it's all completely for the benefit of that
organization because it doesn't have to pay longer telecom charges.
So rather than paying for a four- or five-minute phone call, that
call might be a minute in duration."
But Katz says an even greater benefit to
enterprises is in using VoIP for call center interaction with
customers abroad. Katz uses the example of the Land's End website,
which uses Net2Phone's VoIP technology to provide low-cost telephone
charges to international customers. "A customer in India isn't going
to pay $10 for a phone call to order a $30 sweater," Katz
says.
By allowing customers abroad to make free
international calls to order products with VoIP technology, a
company won't just be saving money, it will be broadening its
customer reach and creating more business.
"This is the best use of VoIP in the near
term, because it builds efficiencies by allowing service agents to
have one customer-facing application," the Jupiter report says. "The
incentive for consumers to experiment with VoIP to replace expensive
toll calls by using such sites as Net2Phone.com and PhoneCalls.com
is huge, because they offer true savings over conventional phone
charges. Should the popularity of these PC-to-phone portals
increase, it may lead to greater acceptance of VoIP as a customer
service interaction channel."
B2B AND VOIP
At first glance, it would seem that the
business-to-business online consumer would be the most likely
candidate to take advantage of VoIP voice and data integration. This
seems especially likely given the high-speed connections and
dedicated phone lines readily available to the business
consumer.
"However, corporate firewalls extinguish
any VoIP opportunities that business buyers' high-speed connections
present," the report says.
But Katz says that Net2Phone's
PC-to-Phone software already accommodates most firewalls, and in the
near term will be equipped to eliminate any problems associated with
firewalls.
And Kowarsky says that within the next
"year or two" VoIP technology will evolve and eliminate the firewall
barrier altogether.
While VoIP technologies are certainly
cost-effective and revolutionary, the report concludes that, as a
means of customer relationship management for online retailers,
there's still progress to be made. E-mail and telephone interaction
will continue to be the primary methods of communication between
online merchants and customers. But where VoIP may prove its stripes
in the e-commerce arena is as an alternative to high-cost
telecommunications charges. As with any revolutionary business
technology, there will certainly be a waiting period before the
optimum future use of VoIP technology will be determined. But as
with any added service merchants offer their customers, there
certainly is some value in diversifying and widening the prospects
for customers to interact with their businesses.
|